|
CHECKLIST OF FATAL FLAWS IN BUSINESS
APPRAISALS
COMMON ERRORS IN BUSINESS
VALUATION
Many business appraisals
contain errors which can result in the opinion of value being
discarded by the Court, or it may significantly reduce the
credibility of the business appraisal expert. Commonly observed
errors include:
1. Applying
an equity rate of return developed from empirical cash flow evidence
to earnings, a non-cash flow number;
- Rates
of return based on Treasury notes, and returns available from other
types of investments returning cash are not the correct rates to
apply to an earnings number when using a discounted cash flow of
capitalization approach.
2. Valuing
a minority interest using control interest assumptions without
proper adjustment;
- Minority
interest holders CANNOT force liquidation so it is inappropriate to
ever use liquidation valuation techniques (adjusted net asset
values) when valuating operating entities.
- When
valuing minority interests using merger and acquisition information,
or after making control adjustments (e.g. adjusting owner’s
compensation to market or related party rent to market) requires an
appropriate application of minority interest discount.
3. Valuing
a controlling interest using minority interest assumptions without
proper adjustments;
- Control
interest valuations developed from public stock exchange per share
pricing of comparable companies must reflect an adjustment for
control which is not existent in per share exchange pricing.
- Control
interest valuations developed from cash flows in which owner’s
compensation and other related party transactions have not been
adjusted to market must reflect an adjustment associated with
control since the controlling interest could and would adjust these
items to her/his benefit.
4. Failure
to properly apply discount for lack of marketability (DLOM);
- When
valuing closely held business interests based on observed marketable
securities’ multiples an adjustment must be made for the closely
held interest’s lack of marketability.
- When
valuing minority interests in a closely held business there is
always a marketability discount unless you are applying market
multiples developed from transactions of minority interests in
closely held businesses, or when applying a prescribed buy/sell
agreement formula.
5.
Applying equity rates of return to cash
flow available to total invested capital (before debt service), or
applying a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to cash flows
available to equity (after debt service payments);
- The
nature of the cash flow being capitalized defines the rate of return
to use, so that cash flow available to equity holders (cash flow
which has been reduced for all required debt service payments) must
be capitalized at equity rates, and cash flow available to all
invested capital (cash flow developed without subtracting required
debt service) must be capitalized at the rate of return associated
with all invested capital (i.e. WACC), both interest bearing debt
and equity.
6. Valuing
a business interest based upon cash flows to the investor AFTER
personal income taxes applicable to the investor;
- Valuation
theory requires fair market value to be based on cash or other
assets available to the investor(s) before investor taxation, since
rates of return and market derived multiples are based on “before”
investor level taxes.
7.
Capitalization rates require achievable
long term growth rates;
- Very
few if any closely held businesses can achieve annual cash flow
growth rates in excess 6% to 7% for any period of time beyond a few
years, maybe 5 years, since, in percentage terms, the business/cash
flow will get to large to achieve that percentage, or the potential
cash flow growth rate will bring in significant competition.
8. Failure
to interview management;
- Without
management interviews the appraiser cannot adequately assess factors
which dramatically impact the risk of the business (and subsequently
the rate of return required by investors), such as customer
concentration, vendor concentration, key employees, anticipated
future capital needs, product/service obsolescence, market
penetration, competition, niche development, etc.
9. Reliance
on historical financial information from time periods not consistent
with current operations;
- Reliance
on operations which have substantially changed will relative to
current operations lead to materially inaccurate cash flow
projections. Only those periods which reflect current services
delivered or products produced and/or sold are reasonable surrogates
for future period projections.
10. Failure
to recognize that revenue growth requires capital investment which
reduces available cash from operations;
- Even
if additional investment in equipment, facilities, or workforce is
not necessary to sustain projected increased revenues, increased
revenues, in the absence of very unusual circumstances, will require
increased capital investment in the form of additional working
capital.
11. Failure
to recognize non-operating assets;
- Assets
owned by the business which can be removed without any impact on
revenues or net operating income/cash flows are considered to be
non-operating assets, and the value developed by capitalizing cash
flows or applying market multiples do not incorporate the value of
these non-operating assets. The value of non-operating assets (e.g.
excess cash, unnecessary vehicles and/or entertainment facilities)
must be added to the value of the interest in operations in order to
properly value an operating business holding non-operating assets.
12. Failure
to properly incorporate investment earnings when valuing an
operating entity;
- Interest
income and other investment earnings generated from working capital
necessary to continue operations should be included in operating
cash flows when capitalizing cash flow, while interest income and
investment earnings from non-operating assets (excess cash) should
not be included in cash flows when capitalizing cash flows.
13. Application
of inappropriate market derived valuation multiples;
- Observed
market multiples (cash flow multiples of sales multiples) will
define a range for the valuation multiple. An application of a
multiple which falls outside of the observed range is a violation of
statistical theory and will generally result in an indefensible
value estimate.
14. Reliance
on book values of debt and equity to develop an appropriate weighted
average cost of capital (WACC);
- As
noted earlier, when developing values by capitalizing cash flow
available to all invested capital (interest bearing debt and
equity), the capitalization rate must be based on both the equity
rate of return and the interest rate associated with the debt,
blended based on the current value of the debt and the current value
of the equity, NOT the book value of the equity. The book value of
equity only reflects historical costs of recorded transactions,
omitting valuable unrecorded intangible assets.
15. Reliance
on Court decisions for quantifiable impacts;
- Reliance
on court decisions is appropriate only when determining appropriate
methodology, but it is NOT appropriate to rely on specific court
decisions or averages of court decisions when determining the
applicable magnitude of discounts or premiums to apply to a specific
valuation, since courts determined those on specific facts and
circumstances of the case in question and the perceived quality of
the case presented.
The errors noted above can easily render a
valuation opinion indefensible and inaccurate. Even if the error
does not result in a significant error, the existence of such an
error materially impacts the credibility of the expert and her/his
report.
DO YOUR EXPERTS’ REPORTS
CONTAIN THESE ERRORS?
DOES THE OTHER SIDE’S
EXPERT’S REPORT CONTAIN THESE ERRORS?
JONES & ROTH, P.C.
William V. Mason II, ASA,
CPA/ABV
Chris Hays, ASA, CVA, CPA/ABV
Return to BV Articles and
Newsletters
Return to BV page
|